Showing posts with label Sydney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sydney. Show all posts

22 November 2016

Sydney Woman paid more than $1 million paid out for Workplace Bullying at NSW Government Agency

The interrogation came out of the blue and continued mercilessly, even while she was doubled over sobbing.

The woman, who was 41 at the time of the incident, has been awarded more than $1 million in a negotiated workplace bullying settlement.

See here for video interview with Lawyer
Australia's million dollar workplace bullying payoutThe lawyer of a woman who was the victim of workplace bullying explains the details of the million dollar case.  

The bullying she experienced at a NSW government agency five years ago has rendered her unable to ever work again.

As two bosses hurled accusations at her during a meeting called to provide her with feedback on an internal job application, the woman who could only speak on the condition of anonymity, said she was in shock and disbelief.

Now aged 46, the victim still has no idea what motivated the attack.
Now aged 46, the victim still has no idea what motivated the attack. Photo: Louie Dovis
Now aged 46, she still has no idea what motivated the attack which had come without any warning. A string of psychiatrists have provided evidence that her mental injury has rendered her unable to return to work. "I can never get those five years back. I can't do what I used to do," she said.

"My career was going well. The agency had just paid for me to do a public service management course. I thought I was earmarked for senior management and then this happened."

The woman's lawyer, Lucinda Gunning from Carroll and O'Dea Lawyers in Sydney, said the more than $1 million payout was made up of two components – one for total and permanent disablement, which was paid out by a private insurer, and a workers compensation payment, for past and future earning capacity.


Lucinda Gunning from Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers says the $1m payout is the highest sum she has seen paid for a workplace ...
Lucinda Gunning from Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers says the $1m payout is the highest sum she has seen paid for a workplace bullying claim.  Photo: Ryan Stuart
"In my experience, this is the highest sum that I have seen paid for a workplace bullying claim," she said. Like many cases of workplace bullying, the circumstances at first glance appear trivial.

The woman who worked in middle management had made an error in an internal application for another job within her state government agency. She had accidentally duplicated an answer to one question in response to another. She says she accepted the error had effectively invalidated the application.

However, her bosses insisted on meeting to provide feedback despite her saying it was unnecessary because she understood her error.

I can never walk into a room with two people in an interview again because of the way they dealt with me.
When she sat down with a male and female supervisor, they accused her of having an inappropriate relationship in the office and of passing off a colleague's ideas as her own, which she flatly denies.
"I was blindsided by it. I couldn't understand where the allegations were coming from," she says.
"Had they given me some sort of notice or asked me in a less hostile environment, I could explain it. It was just incorrect. But they just kept going and going.

"I was sobbing and doubled over and they were still making allegations about information sharing.

"It just didn't stop. At one point they said we can put you in contact with the counselling service.
"I said I will absolutely need it after this meeting and still they went on. I don't know why I didn't walk out. It went on for ages."
When the meeting was finally over, the public servant went on annual leave. 

When she returned to work, she was forced to work with one of the supervisors who had bullied her in the meeting.
"I asked to be moved out of that department. But they felt the need to humiliate me further by sitting me outside their office and the team I used to manage," she said.

"I wasn't allowed to contribute.
"I couldn't breath in there. I felt so useless.
"It got to the point where I would sit in the bathroom for six hours and no one would notice I was there.
"I didn't do any work because I couldn't."
The woman, who described herself as a resilient person before the experience with bullying, was sent to a mediation session with the female supervisor.
"The woman attacked me again to the point where the mediator told her to stop. It was horrible," she said.
"She said I had given another industry representative information about a meeting for stakeholders. But they had sent out a notice of the meeting. It was ridiculous. There was a clear explanation for how someone I was accused of telling found out about the meeting.
"I was trying to explain it to them, but they wouldn't listen.
"The woman accused me of trying to take credit for someone else's work in my job application. I said I wasn't taking credit, I had delegated the work and I was her boss.
"The tone of the meeting could have been very different. They could have just said: 'Could you just please go through this with me'.
"But they were only interested in attacking me. 
"As a result they changed my life. I did not leave that office the same person I was when I arrived."
By May, 2012, the woman left the organisation feeling "hopeless".
Every time she entered a lift she would look to the ground to see if she could identify the shoes of her supervisors. 
"I was terrified. I couldn't be near them," she said.
The woman's complaints were initially investigated in house in what she describes as an unfair process.
It took five years to finalise her claim during which insurance companies put her and her children under surveillance.
"This is a psychological injury, not a physical one," she said.
"Everything was challenged. I was pushed to the absolute limit. I'm surprised I'm actually still here."
After five years of "hell", the woman said she had hoped to feel better now the pressure is off.
"But I still don't," she said.
"I can never get those five years back. I can't do what I used to do."
Source

03 March 2010

Sydney Lawyer Faced Age Discrimination and Harassment at Sydney Legal Firm that made her ill

Former Freehills lawyer Nicole Stransky says that she was bullied.

Former Freehills lawyer Nicole Stransky says that she was bullied. Photo: Luis Enrique Ascui

A FORMER lawyer at Freehills is alleging the high-profile firm discriminated against her due to her age in the latest case to highlight claims of poor working conditions at law firms.

Nicole Stransky, now 50, was employed at Freehills from 2006 as a first-year solicitor in competition law after a previous high-level career in human resources. Ms Stransky said she was bullied and harassed during 2008 and 2009 to such an extent that she had a severe deterioration in her mental health and even had suicidal thoughts.

Her case, now in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, is alleging discrimination on the basis of age, employment activity and her impairment. An earlier unfair dismissal claim was confidentially settled after her job was terminated while she was on sick leave in April last year.

Ms Stransky alleged the partners who supervised her - including the former head of the Trade Practices Commission, Bob Baxt - excluded her and isolated her after she raised concerns about her career development with management in early 2008.

A spokesman for Freehills rejected the claims and said they worked hard to support diversity in the workplace: ''We strongly reject any claim that we have treated her unfairly. We're not in a position to comment on these matters as they will be before the courts.''

A psychiatrist's report on Ms Stransky, commissioned by Freehills in late 2008, found she had a major depressive disorder with anxiety, panic attacks and features of traumatisation. The report described her as ''highly intelligent, open, honest [and] reliable'', and added, ''I had no reason to doubt the reliability, validity, veracity, accuracy or consistency of her account.''

Ms Stransky said she might never be able to work again as a result of the experience as she was still very ill.

But her working career at the firm started well and her initial one-year contract was converted into a full-time role after just six months at Freehills.

''Certainly during the first year or the first 15 months I was blissfully happy, one of the best working years of my life,'' she told The Age.

But she said the problems started once she spoke to human resources in April and May 2008 and told them that younger colleagues were getting more work and that she was being excluded by her partners. ''I did it appropriately, I did it respectfully … my younger colleagues were getting most of the client [billable] work, which I can substantiate with these [work] utilisation reports.''

After that, the work allocated to her dried up to such an extent that she had little to do and eventually no billable work, she claims.

Ms Stransky alleged that her coach and supervising partner, Chris Jose, spoke to her in an aggressive manner with cutting personal remarks on several occasions after she challenged the lack of work.

Later, when she returned from six weeks' sick leave, she said she discovered that Mr Jose had told her colleagues that she had an active WorkCover claim, which she regarded as a serious invasion of her privacy.

The Freehills spokesman said the firm continued to support Ms Stransky ''wherever possible'', including through an income-protection insurance policy and through access to confidential counselling.

Ms Stransky said she was taking the action against Freehills because of the personal suffering and injury and because ''as a lawyer I believe in justice, I want justice to prevail''.

The case follows allegations that a senior lawyer at boutique firm Kelly Hazell Quill Lawyers was sacked for being pregnant and for making complaints about conditions at her work.

Other lawyers say these sorts of complaints about working conditions are regular in bigger firms and that many lawyers end up resigning.

source

05 July 2009

COURSE - Sydney University - Psychopaths in the workplace with Dr John Clarke

Complementary Studies

Psychopaths in the workplace
Presenter: Dr. John Clarke
Cost: AUD165
Meeting: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM | Sat | 14 Nov 09 | 1 meetings


Course description:

The majority of psychopaths are not serial killers or rapists; they're colleagues, bosses and employees found in workplaces throughout Australia. We'll examine what a psychopath is, their personality style, behaviours, interpersonal approach and thought processes. You'll learn how they infiltrate companies undetected and the strategies they use to manipulate those around them to achieve power and promotion. The four different types of workplace psychopath will be explored, and we'll also look at what companies and individuals can do to minimise damage caused by the psychopath. Warning: this course may include material that may confront some students.

Course outline:

- Psychopath Characteristics

- The four types of workplace psychopath - organisational psychopath; corporate criminal psychopath; violent criminal psychopath; and occupational psychopath

- Tactics and Strategies used by each workplace psychopath sub-type

- Workplace Psychopath - Good For Business?

- Victims of the Workplace Psychopath - Protecting yourself and your employees

- Profiling the Workplace Psychopath

- A Case of Mistaken Identity

LINK

John Clarke's PhD (completed through the School of Psychology at the University of Sydney) examined sexual homicide offenders and criminal profiling. John is also the main author of a best selling book examining psychopaths, sexual homicide, stalking, sexual assault, and criminal profiling. He has acted as a consultant in a number of sexual homicide and sexual assault investigations, for both law enforcement and criminal law practitioners. John has extensive experience lecturing in the areas of criminal profiling, sexual homicide, forensic psychology and investigative interviewing to members of numerous law enforcement agencies as well as legal professionals, crime fiction authors and the general public