Showing posts with label Gordon Brown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gordon Brown. Show all posts

05 March 2010

Office Rage : What to do when your boss is a bully?

A new book accuses British Prime Minister Gordon Brown of throwing temper tantrums.

How can employees deal with bullying in the workplace?



He’d punch walls and angrily stab chairs with pens. Frequently, he’d yell at his staff, once pulling a secretary out of her chair for typing too slowly.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has a volcanic temper, according to a new book, The End of the Party, in which political journalist Andrew Rawnsley describes a series of tirades during Mr. Brown’s second and third terms in office.
The book was excerpted in Sunday’s Observer, the same day Christine Pratt, the head of the National Bullying Helpline, revealed that Mr. Brown’s staff had called her service .
In the Prime Minister’s defence, Secretary of State for Business Peter Mandelson told the BBC that Mr. Brown is a leader who “gets angry, but chiefly with himself.” Downing Street staff have described a leader who is simply passionate about his work.
The allegations have stirred experts in the growing workplace-bullying industry, and some say “passion” is the cop-out du jour for intimidating bosses.
“Passion can justify any over-the-top emotion. The message is that everyone else should learn to live with it. That’s what it’s like in a bullying environment: Everyone walks on egg shells, but all cater to the Grand Poobah,” said Gary Namie, founder of the Workplace Bullying Institute.
Dr. Namie, who works with WAVE, a human resources company that deals with workplace bullying, describes the behaviour as “health-harming mistreatment” and “psychological violence.”
According to a 2007 study by the institute of 7,740 Americans, 37 per cent had been bullied at work, and 39 per cent of bully targets suffered clinical depression.
Bullies are often bosses: 72 per cent, the study said. Forty per cent of those are women who target other women; men appear to split their bullying evenly between the sexes.
It seems the man has a temper,” said Gerard Seijts, professor of a leadership course at Richard Ivey School of Business in London, Ont.
Prof. Seijts said hotheads can get far in leadership because no one stands up to them.
“Often times, it requires a lot of courage for people around a leader to speak up. … But every time we don’t correct people on their behaviour, we raise the bar for our moral outrage. If we treat this as acceptable, what becomes unacceptable? Maybe slowly, [Mr. Brown's] behaviour became unacceptable.”
Valerie Cade, a Calgary-based workplace bullying expert and author of Bully Free at Work, said that unlike bullying, Mr. Brown’s explosive tantrums may not be deliberate, but they are “unwanted.”
She said bullied employees need to be able to name the behaviour as such, or else they end up viewing the scenarios as a sign of their own shortcomings.
“This is where people get stuck the most. Naming it as bullying lets you separate yourself from the situation. In the absence of doing that, you’re powerless because you’re trying to figure out what you could do differently.”
Ms. Cade suggests employees confront their bosses in person, with direct language, then follow up via e-mail if the behaviour persists.
“In a corporate environment, now, you’ve made a record of that. Now you’ve got grounds to go to that boss’s boss,” Ms. Cade said.
But she added that most bosses deny the behaviour, and then minimize it with comments such as, “You don’t know the pressure I’m under.”
Dr. Namie noted that human resources staff can only go so far to resolve the conflict.
“Bullying is not an HR problem. It’s an executive-team, administrative, leadership problem, and unless and until they want it to stop, it’s not going to. HR hears all the complaints but they don’t have the power to create a new policy and to enforce it.”
Dr. Namie said the biggest mistake that bullying targets make is to let “the bully sink the claws in” the first time around.
“The bully is testing the water. The failure to confront that is what convinces the bully you’re an easy mark. Unfortunately, what makes a target a target is they didn’t see it coming. They’re constantly surprised.”
Asher Adelman said one way to avoid bosses with volcanic tempers is pre-emptively.
“It’s very rare for a workplace to improve it’s culture. Usually, when things go bad, they only get worse. For the most part, aggressive, abusive managers don’t change their behaviour,” said Mr. Adelman, founder of eBossWatch.com, which lets job seekers troll a database of anonymous posts about bad bosses.
The site has rated the top worst bosses for 2009, including a water distribution superintendent who held a four-hour, profanity-laced meeting and instructed employees to hit each other, a football head coach who broke another coach’s jaw during training camp, and an airline CEO who screamed at his employees in front of hundreds of customers lined up at the airline’s check-in counter, ignoring a sign that warned passengers: “Abusive behaviour towards staff will not be tolerated.”

24 February 2010

PROFILE - UK's National Bullying Helpline Christine Pratt Speaks Out on Lord Mandleson's denial over Workplace Bullying by PM Gordon Brown

The founder of the National Bullying Helpline who is at the centre of the storm surrounding the Prime Minister's alleged bullying.

Profile: Christine Pratt and the National

Bullying Helpline

Charity boss who claimed Downing Street staff called bullying hotline faces uncomfortable questions about her past and business interests.

Christine Pratt, the founder of the National Bullying Helpline

Christine Pratt, the founder of the National Bullying Helpline.

The charity boss who claimed a number of Downing Street employees called her anti-bullying hotline to complain of workplace mistreatment was facing scrutiny today over her alleged behaviour and business affairs.

The most serious allegations concern claims that Christine Pratt, who runs the National Bullying Helpline (NBH), used the helpline to solicit business for the HR consultancy she runs with her husband.

One woman said that when she rang the helpline for "confidential, free advice" four years ago after being bullied at work, she was referred to Pratt's firm, HR & Diversity Management (HRDM), which provides mediation services, and paid them £250.

The Charity Commission investigated the helpline in 2008 after complaints that the NBH's website was registered by a business specialising in supporting those being bullied in the workplace. The commission found no wrongdoing but today said the charity would be reviewed "in light of the issues raised over the weekend and the complaints received today".

Jo Anne Brown, the founder of Just Fight On, a not-for-profit anti-bullying organisation, said she had received a number of complaints in the past three years from people upset after calling the helpline and being directed to Pratt's commercial business.

Adrian Melia, who runs Humane Resources, an employment dispute assistance service, said today he had complained to the Charity Commission some years ago about what he believed was a "conflict of interest" between the NBH and HRDM.

Pratt said that the referral arrangement had been approved by the Law Society.

Melia's concerns about the hotline were ignored led him to launch a blogwith the tagline 'The Bullying Helpline – the last thing you need if you're being bullied,' which lists various complaints made against Pratt and her charity.

Melia said he had twice raised the potential conflict of interest issue in 2007 and 2008 by writing to Professor Cary Cooper, the NBH patron who today resigned from the charity, although he received no response. Cooper today said he discussed Melia's complaints with Pratt, but the Charity Commission exonerated her in its 2008 investigation.

"Yesterday I made up my mind to leave after the breach of confidence of the highest order," Cooper said.

On the NBH website, anyone thinking of ringing is reassured: "Your call is confidential to us and you will be treated with dignity and respect at all times."

Ann Widdecombe, the Conservative MP for Maidstone and the Weald, became patron to the charity several months ago. She admitted she had recently made preliminary inquiries into the charity because of a complaint lodged with the Charity Commission "a little while ago".

"The charity commission had not found any wrongdoing and I was proceeding to look further," Widdecombe said.

Doubts were also raised over Pratt's claim to have beaten workplace bullies herself.

In 2003, an employment tribunal rejected her claim for unfair dismissal from her former employer, Sanden International (Europe Ltd). In thepublicly available judgement dismissing her appeal against the tribunal's decision, Pratt was found to have sent notes considered "discourteous and hostile" and "aggressive, accusatory and confrontational". She had also screamed in a colleague's ear.

The tribunal also dismissed Pratt's claim for discrimination on the grounds of race and sex and a claim that she had been paid less than a male comparator.

Pratt's decision to go public with the complaints relating to Downing Street sparked protests from other anti-bullying campaigners.

Another charity, Bullying UK, issued a statement saying: "We think it's a serious breach of confidentiality for an anti-bullying charity to reveal details like this where such a small number of people are involved and – much worse – could potentially be identified.

"It will deter other people from coming forward for help if they think that anti-bullying charities are going to splash their employer's name all over the media."

One woman who called the helpline in 2006 after being bullied at work, said she felt Pratt took advantage of her when she was at her most vulnerable. After two phone calls, the woman was invited to a face-to-face meeting with Pratt, who encouraged her to sign a contract for HR & Diversity Management. The contract, seen by the Guardian, says HRDM will provide "support and advice" for an initial fee of £250 and then a rate of £50 per hour.

"[Pratt] said I shouldn't go to lawyers, that they weren't experts in bullying but that she was, and she said she would go into my firm and do an independent investigation," said the woman, who did not want to be named.

Questions also emerged over the accounting practices of the NBH as the Charity Commission revealed the charity had has failed to provide financial information for the financial year which ended 30 September 2008. "We expected this information by 30 July 2009," said a spokeswoman. "If the charity's income for the year ended 30 September 2008 is under £10,000, the charity is asked to submit an Annual Update to the Commission, setting out key financial information. If the charity's income for that year is £10,000 or over, the charity is required to submit an Annual Return and Accounts.

"The Charity Commission has sent The National Bullying Helpline three reminders in respect of its outstanding information. These reminders have been sent to the charity on the 2 April 2009, 5 June 2009 and 9 August 2009 respectively. We will continue to pursue the charity for its outstanding information."

source