13 March 2010

School Bullying Resources

I came across a few good examples of how Governments are addressing School Bullying, The Australian ACT Government has this resource available on their website.

I also found the below online course on School Bullying ....

The ABCs of Bullying
Addressing, Blocking, and Curbing School Aggression

ABOUT THE COURSE
Start Course

At one time, school bullying may have been viewed as a "rite of passage" which built "character." Today, however, it's no longer regarded as just something that happens during playground routines.

Educators, health and mental health practitioners, parents, and community members are realizing that bullying is a serious problem that can lead to more severe long-term problems for individuals and communities. Some experts believe that bullying should be considered a special form of child abuse-sometimes called "peer abuse," the cruelty of children to each other.

This course examines the causes and effects of bullying, prevention techniques and programs, screening, treatment options, and legal/ethical issues surrounding bullying.

Who Can Use This Course

This online course is designed for professionals in education, health and mental health, and related fields, including social workers, school counselors, school nurses, teachers, and principals. Quizzes at the end of course modules allow course participants to gauge their learning against course objectives.

What Is Covered in This Course

The term "bullying" refers to a broad range of bullying behaviors that include physical, verbal, sexual, and other psychological actions such as intimidation and continual threats.

Research indicates that, in general, victimization rates decrease with age, but rates of bullying, while starting in elementary school (or earlier), peak in middle school, and may continue in high school in different forms. Because this course focuses on prevention, particular attention has been given to the problem of bullying in elementary and middle school. Prevention materials are intended for students in elementary through high school and for community-wide use.

The Resources section includes publications, telephone hotlines, Web sites, videos, and other materials that provide additional information on school bullying and other topics relating to violence. Listing of these resources is provided solely as a service; it does not constitute an endorsement by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is not responsible for the content found in these materials.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE COURSE START PAGE

10 March 2010

Remembering The Victims of Workplace Bullying - Stuart McGregor's story

Bullying: Stuart McGregor's story

VIDEO INTERVIEW with Stuarts Mother

Alannah McGregor tells the story of how her son fell victim to workplace bullying so severe he eventually committed suicide.

IT'S been seven years, but the way Alannah McGregor sounds when she talks about two of her three children, it could have happened yesterday. Grief sounds like this; tight-chested but calm, with an unbearable sadness seeping through the words.

They were born four years apart, but Stuart, 20, and Angela McGregor, 16, were close. She was the youngest and he was the oldest - they did things together. She was his closest confidant. She defended him fiercely. And they died a month apart.

Workplace bullying did this, says Alannah and her husband, Ray McGregor.

Alannah McGregor and, inset, her children Stuart and Angela.

Alannah McGregor and, inset, her children Stuart and Angela.

The case of 19-year-old Victorian woman Brodie Panlock, who took her own life after sustained bullying at work, has recently galvanised attention around this ugly but under-reported reality in our working lives.

But before Brodie, there was Stuart.

Stuart had always wanted to be a chef. He was three months away from turning 17 when he scored a highly sought-after apprenticeship as a chef in a kitchen in Bendigo, beating 70 others to the job.

But what should have been a dream job unaccountably turned ugly. Name-calling, verbal abuse and innuendo about his sexuality were common.

His apprentice paperwork was ignored and he was ridiculed. Once he was given a 10-kilogram bag of peas and told to count them. Another time, when Stuart asked about a soup recipe, the bully stood over him, berating him and telling him to ring the chief executive of the company to ask for it.

The main perpetrator was the manager of the kitchen, but following his lead, others would join in.

One day Stuart rang Alannah at lunch-time, excited. Word was going around that he was in line for an employee award, he told her proudly. But he returned from work that evening, furious. Workmates had broken into his car and stolen the knob off his gearstick, wrapped it and ''presented'' it to him as his ''award'' in front of everyone. Stuart had felt humiliated and belittled.

Eventually, Stuart admitted to his parents he hated work and that one person in particular was ''picking on him''. He did not go into details.

Without realising the seriousness of the situation, Alannah says her and her husband's initial reaction was that ''it's not right, but you're an apprentice, you're going to have to put up with it for a while''. It is advice she regrets deeply. Stuart shut down and would not talk about it again.

Later, Alannah heard another deeply alarming story.

Just before the end of Stuart's three-month probation period, he was invited on a camping trip. Initially excited, he then went quiet and made excuses not to go. Much later, it came out that the man who had been bullying Stuart had told him that he ''would have blood up your arse and grass on your knees'' if he went on the trip. Stuart was badly frightened by this.

Eventually the bullying culture came to light after another apprentice complained. Stuart initially denied it; perhaps he still thought he could manage the situation, or probably he was concerned about losing his job, a concern that proved well-founded.

The McGregors say there was an initial internal investigation, which proved unsatisfactory to them. They approached the Equal Opportunity Commission and WorkCover stepped in.

While the allegations were being investigated, Stuart found it impossible to work directly under his alleged perpetrator. Put on WorkCover payments, he never returned to full-time work in his chosen profession again.

Alannah says she was told the bully faced disciplinary action, but remained there while WorkCover concluded their investigations.

In the meantime, Stuart's mental health deteriorated sharply. His chronic depression worsened and as the investigation progressed, he began self-harming. Stuart also began smoking marijuana heavily, negatively affecting the family.

Workcover finished its investigation. Stuart's claims were substantiated, Alannah says, but inspectors were unsure whether there was enough evidence to take to court. But they would make their decision soon.

Meanwhile, unknown to those around her, a quiet despair had entered the life of Angela, the McGregors' youngest daughter. (The McGregors have a second daughter, Stacey, who is now 25.)

Alannah and Ray did not realise it but Stuart had confided in Angela the most distressing details of his bullying, which the family have asked The Age not to publish.

Angela was a lively, ''loud and funny'' girl who was very popular. ''Very grown up for her age, but I guess underneath she was probably depressed and I just realised that myself,'' Alannah says.

Fiercely loyal, Angela regularly defended her increasingly unwell brother against the cruel gibes at school and the local sporting club. ''People just make fun of mental illness,'' Alannah says.

But Angela, too, had been the subject of schoolyard bullying after speaking out over an incident she witnessed in the schoolyard. From her brother's experience, Angela believed no one would help her.

Alannah feels this, on top of her sensitive daughter's great distress at her brother's treatment and the belief certain details of the bullying would be aired against Stuart's wishes, culminated in a terrible decision to take her own life. She was 16. A month later, Stuart was also dead.

''He fought so hard to stay alive,'' Alannah says. ''But he probably blamed himself for his sister's death. I imagine he couldn't live with himself after that.''

IT MAY be some small consolation that in its own modest way, Stuart's case helped contribute to legislative changes that would have an impact on another case involving the death of a vulnerable young worker - Brodie Panlock.

The circumstances are now widely known: how 19-year-old Brodie was subjected to an ''unbearable level of humiliation'' in her work at Cafe Vamp in Hawthorn that led to her suicide in 2006. Last month, Nicholas Smallwood, 26, Rhys MacAlpine, 28, and Gabriel Toomey, 23, were convicted and fined a total of $85,000, while cafe owner Marc Da Cruz, 43, and his company Map Foundation were convicted and fined a total of $250,000 on charges that included failing to provide and maintain a safe working environment. The cafe has since been sold to new owners.

Following an independent review conducted by then-barrister and now Court of Appeal president Justice Chris Maxwell in 2004, the Occupational Health and Safety Act was amended to recognise the importance of psychological health at work.

This change was considered an important tool in helping to more effectively prosecute bullying at work, a WorkSafe spokesman told The Age.

Alannah understands that Stuart's story made its way into the extensive consultation at the time.

One imagines that when something as cataclysmic as a death - whether it is a suicide or an accident - occurs in the workplace, an employer's first action would be to sit down with the bereaved family and talk. In fact the opposite can be true, according to a report published last July which sought to investigate the approaches used to deal with workplace deaths. In a consultation paper prepared for Uniting Care Victoria's Creative Ministries Network (CMN) and funded by the Legal Services Board of Victoria, researcher Derek Brookes found concerns over legal liability meant some employers refused to meet bereaved families.

In many cases, grieving families would be immensely comforted by an apology. Yet the adversarial legal system, concerned with attributing blame and apportioning damages, struggles to accommodate such action.

This is where a modest project run by CMN may just blossom into a world-first. Restorative justice, a term most commonly linked with juvenile offenders, involves victims and perpetrators meeting to discuss the impact of the offenders' actions. It is not linked to legal action. As part of its grief counselling service, CMN had began to investigate the viability of using restorative justice principles to deal with work-related deaths, both accidental and by suicide. Last year, the service received $50,000 from the Legal Services Board of Victoria to establish a model for how restorative justice might fit in with Victoria's legal framework. CMN is now preparing to begin a test case and, if it is successful, will approach the Victorian government to fund a three-year pilot program, the first in the world.

CMN director the Reverend John Bottomley says that while legal remedies continue to be appropriate, those seeking ''healing and restoration'' should also be accommodated.

''Part of the restoration may be the reputation of the person who died, so they are not remembered only in terms of a traumatic death but what they achieved in their life,'' Bottomley says.

He concedes the main issue remains liability. Would an expression of sorrow affect the rights of a family to take legal action? Or the rights of the company? When should an apology be given? Could it be taken into account during a court case?

But Bottomley believes such principles can work with courts, WorkSafe and the coroner. Bottomley nominates the increasing use by WorkSafe of enforceable undertakings, where companies are directed to put money into a project identified by the family, as an example of ''restorative'' practices that already exist.

(WorkSafe says it supports the concept of restorative justice, as well as the wider use of victim impact statements as recently announced by Attorney-General Rob Hulls.)

''Restorative justice gives both parties an opportunity for the parties to actually deal with the deaths,'' Bottomley says. ''What the courts currently deal with now is a breach of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.''

IN THE aftermath of her children's deaths, Alannah McGregor made a courageous decision. She would puncture the terrible stigma that continues to exist around suicide and talk about what had happened. She spoke in local forums around Bendigo, but it was a chance conversation with trucking magnate Lindsay Fox at a company function with her husband, Ray, that helped her tell her story more widely.

Fox's family had also been affected by suicide, with the death of his son Michael in 1991. He threw his weight behind a project to educate people on the impact of bullying.

The result was Stuart's Story, a 10-minute video made in 2004 with the financial support of Linfox, distributed first in the company's workplaces and then more widely.

Alannah makes a special point of urging people who witness bullying to speak up. She also believes a restorative justice approach may have been helpful for Stuart, at least in the early days.

Stuart's father, Ray, has previously chosen not to speak publicly about the deaths of two of his children. But in an open letter provided to The Age he offers his deepest sympathy to the Panlocks, writing that he shares with Brodie's father, Damien Panlock, the agony of not being able protect his children.

''I would like to see that those who have died will not have died in vain, but leave a legacy that dignifies them by working towards changing the culture in our workplaces,'' Ray writes.

''Relying on the publicity of court cases will not make change as many believe it will. Some believe it will never happen in their workplace or that the snide remarks or behaviour is not really bullying and will not bring about the tragedy of suicide due to workplace bullying.

''It was very hard to get to that point in my life, but each day I work at it and hope that by speaking about it that there is hope for the future.''

For help or information visit beyondblue.org.au, call Suicide Helpline Victoria on 1300 651 251, or Lifeline on 131 114.

For more information on workplace bullying, go to worksafe.vic.gov.au

For work-related grief support, visit Uniting Care Victoria's Creative Ministries Network at cmn.unitingcare.org.au or phone 9827 8322.

source

06 March 2010

DISCUSSION - When does robust behaviour turn into bullying?

Please note this may be considered a 'biased political piece' leaning towards Brown.

The row over claims that the chief of the civil service warned Gordon Brown over abusive treatment of staff has sparked a debate about bullying. Observer policy editor Anushka Asthana asks bloggers how big a problem it is.
An open an interesting discussion.


Link to the comments here

05 March 2010

Office Rage : What to do when your boss is a bully?

A new book accuses British Prime Minister Gordon Brown of throwing temper tantrums.

How can employees deal with bullying in the workplace?



He’d punch walls and angrily stab chairs with pens. Frequently, he’d yell at his staff, once pulling a secretary out of her chair for typing too slowly.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has a volcanic temper, according to a new book, The End of the Party, in which political journalist Andrew Rawnsley describes a series of tirades during Mr. Brown’s second and third terms in office.
The book was excerpted in Sunday’s Observer, the same day Christine Pratt, the head of the National Bullying Helpline, revealed that Mr. Brown’s staff had called her service .
In the Prime Minister’s defence, Secretary of State for Business Peter Mandelson told the BBC that Mr. Brown is a leader who “gets angry, but chiefly with himself.” Downing Street staff have described a leader who is simply passionate about his work.
The allegations have stirred experts in the growing workplace-bullying industry, and some say “passion” is the cop-out du jour for intimidating bosses.
“Passion can justify any over-the-top emotion. The message is that everyone else should learn to live with it. That’s what it’s like in a bullying environment: Everyone walks on egg shells, but all cater to the Grand Poobah,” said Gary Namie, founder of the Workplace Bullying Institute.
Dr. Namie, who works with WAVE, a human resources company that deals with workplace bullying, describes the behaviour as “health-harming mistreatment” and “psychological violence.”
According to a 2007 study by the institute of 7,740 Americans, 37 per cent had been bullied at work, and 39 per cent of bully targets suffered clinical depression.
Bullies are often bosses: 72 per cent, the study said. Forty per cent of those are women who target other women; men appear to split their bullying evenly between the sexes.
It seems the man has a temper,” said Gerard Seijts, professor of a leadership course at Richard Ivey School of Business in London, Ont.
Prof. Seijts said hotheads can get far in leadership because no one stands up to them.
“Often times, it requires a lot of courage for people around a leader to speak up. … But every time we don’t correct people on their behaviour, we raise the bar for our moral outrage. If we treat this as acceptable, what becomes unacceptable? Maybe slowly, [Mr. Brown's] behaviour became unacceptable.”
Valerie Cade, a Calgary-based workplace bullying expert and author of Bully Free at Work, said that unlike bullying, Mr. Brown’s explosive tantrums may not be deliberate, but they are “unwanted.”
She said bullied employees need to be able to name the behaviour as such, or else they end up viewing the scenarios as a sign of their own shortcomings.
“This is where people get stuck the most. Naming it as bullying lets you separate yourself from the situation. In the absence of doing that, you’re powerless because you’re trying to figure out what you could do differently.”
Ms. Cade suggests employees confront their bosses in person, with direct language, then follow up via e-mail if the behaviour persists.
“In a corporate environment, now, you’ve made a record of that. Now you’ve got grounds to go to that boss’s boss,” Ms. Cade said.
But she added that most bosses deny the behaviour, and then minimize it with comments such as, “You don’t know the pressure I’m under.”
Dr. Namie noted that human resources staff can only go so far to resolve the conflict.
“Bullying is not an HR problem. It’s an executive-team, administrative, leadership problem, and unless and until they want it to stop, it’s not going to. HR hears all the complaints but they don’t have the power to create a new policy and to enforce it.”
Dr. Namie said the biggest mistake that bullying targets make is to let “the bully sink the claws in” the first time around.
“The bully is testing the water. The failure to confront that is what convinces the bully you’re an easy mark. Unfortunately, what makes a target a target is they didn’t see it coming. They’re constantly surprised.”
Asher Adelman said one way to avoid bosses with volcanic tempers is pre-emptively.
“It’s very rare for a workplace to improve it’s culture. Usually, when things go bad, they only get worse. For the most part, aggressive, abusive managers don’t change their behaviour,” said Mr. Adelman, founder of eBossWatch.com, which lets job seekers troll a database of anonymous posts about bad bosses.
The site has rated the top worst bosses for 2009, including a water distribution superintendent who held a four-hour, profanity-laced meeting and instructed employees to hit each other, a football head coach who broke another coach’s jaw during training camp, and an airline CEO who screamed at his employees in front of hundreds of customers lined up at the airline’s check-in counter, ignoring a sign that warned passengers: “Abusive behaviour towards staff will not be tolerated.”

03 March 2010

Sydney Lawyer Faced Age Discrimination and Harassment at Sydney Legal Firm that made her ill

Former Freehills lawyer Nicole Stransky says that she was bullied.

Former Freehills lawyer Nicole Stransky says that she was bullied. Photo: Luis Enrique Ascui

A FORMER lawyer at Freehills is alleging the high-profile firm discriminated against her due to her age in the latest case to highlight claims of poor working conditions at law firms.

Nicole Stransky, now 50, was employed at Freehills from 2006 as a first-year solicitor in competition law after a previous high-level career in human resources. Ms Stransky said she was bullied and harassed during 2008 and 2009 to such an extent that she had a severe deterioration in her mental health and even had suicidal thoughts.

Her case, now in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, is alleging discrimination on the basis of age, employment activity and her impairment. An earlier unfair dismissal claim was confidentially settled after her job was terminated while she was on sick leave in April last year.

Ms Stransky alleged the partners who supervised her - including the former head of the Trade Practices Commission, Bob Baxt - excluded her and isolated her after she raised concerns about her career development with management in early 2008.

A spokesman for Freehills rejected the claims and said they worked hard to support diversity in the workplace: ''We strongly reject any claim that we have treated her unfairly. We're not in a position to comment on these matters as they will be before the courts.''

A psychiatrist's report on Ms Stransky, commissioned by Freehills in late 2008, found she had a major depressive disorder with anxiety, panic attacks and features of traumatisation. The report described her as ''highly intelligent, open, honest [and] reliable'', and added, ''I had no reason to doubt the reliability, validity, veracity, accuracy or consistency of her account.''

Ms Stransky said she might never be able to work again as a result of the experience as she was still very ill.

But her working career at the firm started well and her initial one-year contract was converted into a full-time role after just six months at Freehills.

''Certainly during the first year or the first 15 months I was blissfully happy, one of the best working years of my life,'' she told The Age.

But she said the problems started once she spoke to human resources in April and May 2008 and told them that younger colleagues were getting more work and that she was being excluded by her partners. ''I did it appropriately, I did it respectfully … my younger colleagues were getting most of the client [billable] work, which I can substantiate with these [work] utilisation reports.''

After that, the work allocated to her dried up to such an extent that she had little to do and eventually no billable work, she claims.

Ms Stransky alleged that her coach and supervising partner, Chris Jose, spoke to her in an aggressive manner with cutting personal remarks on several occasions after she challenged the lack of work.

Later, when she returned from six weeks' sick leave, she said she discovered that Mr Jose had told her colleagues that she had an active WorkCover claim, which she regarded as a serious invasion of her privacy.

The Freehills spokesman said the firm continued to support Ms Stransky ''wherever possible'', including through an income-protection insurance policy and through access to confidential counselling.

Ms Stransky said she was taking the action against Freehills because of the personal suffering and injury and because ''as a lawyer I believe in justice, I want justice to prevail''.

The case follows allegations that a senior lawyer at boutique firm Kelly Hazell Quill Lawyers was sacked for being pregnant and for making complaints about conditions at her work.

Other lawyers say these sorts of complaints about working conditions are regular in bigger firms and that many lawyers end up resigning.

source

02 March 2010

FILM - When Bullying Power Infects Society and a Nation - A look at Papua New Guinea Political Culture

From People & Power - Bullying Power

Part 1 - Democracy v The Cult Of Personality
Papua New Guinea is rife with unemployment, crime and tribal feuds. People & Power explore what future is in store for this poverty-stricken nation.


Part 2 - Breaking the Cycle of Tribal Loyalty

01 March 2010

SHOVEGATE : Aide's claim that Gordon Brown barged him reignites row over bullying at No10

Gordon Brown was under fresh pressure over allegations of bullying last night after one of his senior aides described how he was roughly pushed aside by the Prime Minister.


Stewart Wood, Mr Brown's senior foreign policy adviser, revealed how he had been left feeling 'pretty shocked' by his boss's violent behaviour. Dr Wood also discloses how the Prime Minister is 'routinely rude' to his staff and admits that his behaviour is unacceptable.

Adviser: Dr Wood, circled, walks along behind Peter Mandelson and the Prime Minister

Adviser: Dr Wood, circled, walks along behind Peter Mandelson and the Prime Minister


His version of events, which appeared yesterday in the Mail on Sunday, casts doubt over Mr Brown's denial that he has 'never, never hit anybody'.


In an interview with Channel 4 News, the Prime Minister also claimed he had never 'shoved' anybody. 'No. I don't do these sorts of things,' he said. However, Dr Wood has made it clear that Mr Brown did push him.


n a tape-recorded interview with author Suzie Mackenzie, who is writing an authorised biography of Mr Brown, the Oxford don told her: 'I was standing at the top of the stairs at No10.

'There was a reception for EU ambassadors and I was waiting with a one-pager (a one page-briefing note) to show him before he went in, to say these are the three people you need to speak to.


'And... and he was in a really bad mood. He walked up the stairs. And I leant forward and he went, "Outta my way" and he did that (Dr Wood is said to have raised his arm in a strong, sweeping gesture imitating Mr Brown's action), "get outta my way". And just walked in and then did it, smile on his face.


'They didn't notice anything was different, I was on his shoulder and then he walked off.'

Dr Wood described his own reaction, recalling: 'I did say, "Bloody hell". And I was pretty shocked.' He added: 'I do think there is an element of Gordon, that I mean, Gordon can be rude... in a kind of routine way.'


He said people at No 10 used to apologise for the way Mr Brown treated staff, but admitted that he had concerns about the Prime Minister's conduct.

'I used to think, "Oh, that's just Gordon". And I think as a team we too often say, "That's just Gordon", we all try and apologise for it. But actually it is important,' he said.

'It's become more important since he's become Prime Minister because how you deal with human beings is actually a core part of the job.'


His comments appear to back up claims by political journalist Andrew Rawnsley that the aide had been 'roughly shoved aside' by the Prime Minister. Last night, Dr Wood issued a statement insisting that the Prime Minister had never struck or punched him. Dr Wood, who is a Fellow of Magdalen College, is one of Mr Brown's closest and most loyal aides and has worked with him for many years.


In his statement, he said: 'As I explained in my private discussion with Suzie Mackenzie, allegations that Gordon struck or punched me are totally wrong. I know he would never do that to anyone.

'As I recall, he was in a hurry that day and barged past me.

'But he didn't shove me. It did annoy me at the time, but it was an isolated incident.

'Gordon is a demanding person to work for, and it is no secret that at times he loses his temper as he is impatient to get things done.'

Mr Rawnsley said: 'It is now clear that it is Gordon Brown who lied and not me. I look forward to an apology.'

source